


No. The optimization mathematics run behind the scenes. They use SchellingPoint's collective intelligence processing that turns opinions into data and GDM-Design optimization rules to do the thinking for the group.
It is a principle of Operational Research, a decision-making discipline. The principle is in practice unseen throughout everyday life, from minimizing roadwork disruption to maximizing same-day order deliveries.
Fit is the utility of the goals, the degree to which they address the Cost of Inaction - doing nothing. Feasibility is the likelihood the target outcomes can be attained. Alignment is the degree to which the people needed for success will take the right actions. Remove anyone of these three, and the quality judgment is incomplete. Additional characteristics are just a sub-form of these three, adding no new insight.
Whether with these labels or not, groups do strive to create goals and actions that have Fit, Feasibility, and Alignment. Unfortunately, traditional concepts and methods (Constructive GDM) cause most groups to produce only one of the three with any valid confidence.
oFFA is the acronym for Optimal Fiti, Feasibility, and Alignment. It is the point where the goals and action represent the best balance of Closest Fit, Maximum Feasibility and Sufficient Alignment. Any increase in one would cause a decrease in the one or both of the others. SchellingPoint's GDM Optimization logic suggests what a group should discuss to produce an oFFA output.