
Groups believe they are at point A, and identify point B as the topic's target state. Diagnostic flaws cause most to unknowingly be starting from C, and should be aiming for D.
Most goals and actions look good on paper but start with implementation probabalities that would unacceptable from surgeons, financial advisers or the military.
Most groups believe their goals and plans possess sufficient alignment. A subjective claim, when measured, 96% have insufficent alignment.







Decision-making research focused on individual choice selection, not on how groups design goals and actions together. Without a research base, every consultant, facilitator, and leader improvised.
Because the quality leaks are structural, not behavioral. Inaccurate concepts. Flawed methods. Missing frames. The best people, data, knowledge, and wisdom cannot overcome the methodology weaknesses.